A man with severe mental illness made homeless for not attending appointments he didn’t know about.  A deaf man unable to speak and with learning disability having his benefits removed after a “consultation”.  A woman recently sectioned having her benefits removed in similar circumstances.  And a victim of savage sexual assault having her benefits removed for no real reason at all.  And that's on top of Dave Boyce and Tina Leslie.  These are just a few examples of my cases where the claimant’s entitlement is obvious, but where administrative devices are used to remove entitlements and enforce destitution.

Having been in regular contact with the DWP, and its predecessors, over more than 20 years I've been forced to the conclusion there are now people at work deliberately hurting disabled people.  It’s like child abusers getting jobs in children’s homes, but the DWP does not appear to check its staff, nor those of its agents, for hatred of disabled people.  This, despite there being reported increases in disability hate crime of between one third and one half in a single year.  It would be naïve to think that such people could never get a job at the DWP. 

Many, if not most, people faced with this proposition will think something like, “That’s going much too far, it’s just the system and staff are forced to do it etc”.  But there’s no legal basis for most of the benefits removals I see – it’s driven by the custom and practice of the DWP.  And how does that custom and practice come about?  Because of those within the DWP – a mixture of politicians and officials, not many of course, but some and the number of those sorts of people seems to be growing, despite the vast majority of Officials of course not being in this bracket at all and doing their best etc.

But, nevertheless, there are some actions taken that only seem to me explainable by this deeply disturbing current of evil.

Looking at history, the parallels are terrifying.

That DWP agents who do the personal assessments for ESA and PIP cannot be trusted.  Although some assessments are carried out properly, many are not, and some are fabricated to justify the removal of benefits.

As such it is essential that anyone having one of these personal assessments gets it recorded.  If you have to go to an assessment centre they should have recording equipment available.  If you have one at home then you should have the same opportunity to have your interview recorded as if you went to an assessment centre.  So insist on the same and get advice if they refuse.

To have your ESA examination recorded call the "Health Assessment Advisory Service" on 0800 288 8777.  The guidance is here.

For PIP you can also get your assessment recorded and you are strongly encouraged to insist on it.  If this threatens to delay your claim and you cannot afford the delay then record it yourself as happened here.

If you do not have it recorded it could be your word against theirs and you run the risk of being stitched up.

Before I set up Kester Disability Rights I picked up Tina's case whilst volunteering for an advice centre in Salford.  Tina had all her income removed because she was unable to respond to letters from the DWP.  Mitchell Woolf, a solicitor from Scott Moncrief and Associates, who also did a landmark DLA case, kindly agreed to take the case pro bono and was assisted by Fiona Scolding QC from counsel who also kindly volunteered to help Tina. 

The DWP agreed to make the payment without a hearing.  It flags up a problem with the Equality Act, that compensation levels are on the low side relative to the levels of distress than can be involved.  Even though it was obvious Tina would struggle with post, the DWP sent her letters and then stopped her money when she couldn't respond.  She had no other income and was threatened with homelessness as a result.  That was extreme disability discrimination.  But at least the going rates of disability discrimination compensation means these type of cases are always small claims and so the most informal and low risk of the County Court "tracks".

The DWP's Managing Customer Records Guide indicates that records are routinely destroyed after just 14 months.  It's been the policy of the all the organisations I've ever worked for to keep such records for at least 6 years.

In several cases I've seen documents destroyed by the DWP, but retained by claimants, have been crucial.  My advice is never throw anything away you receive from the DWP - it could be important later on.

The Women and Equalities Select Committee at the House of Commons is investigating (lack of) Equality Act enforcement.  We're suggesting that the social security tribunal is given the power to consider Equality Act claims like the employment tribunal and special educational needs tribunal already can.  We're also pushing for the courts service to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people.  See the full submission here.

Interesting that the DWP has just revealed in correspondence that it appears to have a policy not to stop ESA claimants' payments if they're known to have mental health problems and are unable to complete and return a questionnaire,

"...in accordance with DWP policy, if someone with a mental health condition does not return their ESA50 questionnaire within the usual four week period their benefit does not end, as it would for other claims".

This comes hot on the heals of it being revealed that the DWP also does not stop payments when claimants' with cervical myelopathy cannot return questionnaires.

Will be interesting to see if any cases come through that have "slipped through the net"!